Products & Tech News Collecting Latest Products and Tech News all over the world. Share your idea and enjoy!

23Jul/100

Virgin America Flights Now Get Enhanced Google Maps Data

Virgin America Flights Now Get Enhanced Google Maps Data

Virgin America, which was the first to offer Wi-Fi on all of its planes, has now taken the Internet love one step further, and is now offering users the option to shop in SkyMall, view enhanced Google Maps, and even open a bar tab in-flight. These services come in addition to the services that are already available such as TV, music, games, passenger chat and food ordering. With this new update, users will be able to pay for their in-flight purchases directly with a credit card. The Google Maps feature is another nice move, as users will be able to get terrain view of the maps and zoom in, something many folks would love to try while many thousand feet in the sky.

Permalink: Virgin America Flights Now Get Enhanced Google Maps Data from Ubergizmo | Hot: iPhone 4 Review, iPad Review

Go here to read the rest:
Virgin America Flights Now Get Enhanced Google Maps Data

13Jul/100

How-To: Ninja vs. zombie shadow caster

zombiesvsninjas.jpg

Randy Sarafan at Instructables writes:

A few weeks ago I saw a laser cut zombie shadow cast in the Makers Market and thought to myself that it was okay, but it was missing a certain something. What could it be? Was it source files perhaps? Well... yes, but... no... that wasn't quite it. There was just something about it not sitting right.

This existential absence gnawed at my brrrrraiiinnnnsssss and left me cold. That is, until it finally hit me like a shuriken. The original shadow cast was missing totally awesome ninjas. I corrected this problem and then wailed on my guitar.

If you happen to have access to a laser cutter, a friend with access to a laser cutter or internet access and a credit card (ahem... ponoko.com), then you can make your own today!

More:

Zombie Shadowcaster

Read the Full Story

25Jun/100

Visa starts family-friendly PayPal rival called payclick

PayPal haters now have another option to pay for junk online. It’s called payclick (all lowercase = money), and it was developed by Visa. They’re marketing it to teens and their families—“Safe & Secure purchasing for the family.” Basically, instead of using PayPal or directly using your credit card, you set up a payclick account then go to town.

You link your payclick account to a credit card or bank account (like PayPal), then select payclick at checkout.

By far the biggest online store using the system is iTunes. The other ones are here, if you’re so inclined.

It’s free to use for you and me, and sellers will have to pay “competitive” fees to participate.

The big idea is that parents can give their kids a payclick account, then keep the account flush with funds as they see fit. Kids can’t go around adding funds to their account without parental authorization.

Why did I just write a story about this? Oh, right: I’m killing time till the Spain-Chile game.



See the rest here:
Visa starts family-friendly PayPal rival called payclick

20May/100

Apple Finally Starts Taking Cash Payments For iPads [Apple]

Until now, you could not purchase an iPad with cash. Instead you had to swipe a credit card and make it easier for Apple to make sure that you're obeying the two-iPads-per-person limit. Things changed though, because of one woman. More

12May/100

AMD’s Vision: The chip race is finally over

Remember back in the day when you could go into a store and compare two clock speeds and come out with the right machine for you? Everything else was immaterial. Hard drives could be upgraded, memory could be added, but clock speed was the number you lived or died by. 1.8GHz was better than 1.5GHz every day of the week, right?

Those days are over. Moore’s Law, the idea that “the number of transistors that can be placed inexpensively on an integrated circuit doubles every two years” is nearly over, which is why multiple cores are now appearing in consumer PCs. When you have multiple cores, clock speed doesn’t make any sense. A 2.5GHz quad-core machine, to the average Joe or Jane, seems to mean that the PC has four cores running at 2.5GHz each. That means it’s 10GHz, right? Right?

Wrong, but that doesn’t matter anymore. AMD – and, to some extent, Intel – has been moving steadily away from clock speeds for years and this is the year they leave them behind entirely. Take a look at AMD’s Vision page. This new naming convention offers choices based on use case. For example, Vision Premium offers the ability to:

Run several applications at once
Play mainstream games
Convert CDs to MP3s
Perform basic photo editing
Watch Blu-Ray/HD movies
Use a webcam

Then, when you click on “Show me Vision Premium Laptops,” you are led to a list of PCs and laptops that are quite disparate in their power and specs. The assumption is that if a laptop falls under a Vision tranche, you’re good. The only number that now matters is price. If you pay more, you get a bit more. And if you want to dig into the specs, you can, but the only things that are going to change the price are the storage and memory components. The processor and, presumably, the graphics solution, will stay the same.

I, for one, welcome our Vision overlords. The question “What laptop should I buy?” can be answered with a wave of ones hand: go over there, pick a pretty one. That’s essentially what we’re dealing with these days, anyway, the commoditization of computing hardware. If the netbook revolution has taught us anything it’s that consumers don’t want power, they want the package. Let the geeks cling to their graphics cards and overclocking while the rest of the world wanders into Best Buy, drops a credit card, and wanders out happy.

I know I sound a bit facetious, but I’m not. This is 2010. Computing, in a way, is flat. When the iPad and its ilk are on the same level playing field as an Alienware monster laptop, you really can’t look at speeds and feeds anymore. The question now is “Does this do video?” or “Does this play games?” and you’d say, “Well, it has a 2GHz processor and discrete graphics and 4GB of RAM, so yes.” Now you say “Does it run Windows 7? Then it can probably run a few good games.” There are thousands of games, after all, and most of them run fine with a bit of coaxing. Do you want the ultimate in performance? Build it yourself or go for Vision Black. The choice is yours and it’s gotten much easier.

My hope is that Intel begins adopting this nomenclature for their processors as well. By segmenting the product line into a few understandable blocks, you reduce complexity and, in the end, assist the consumer more than anyone will ever know.



View original post here:
AMD’s Vision: The chip race is finally over

11May/100

Boxee for iPhone, iPad and Android all but confirmed in Vindicia payment processing deal

Oh sure, having Boxee nailed down to the desktop of your PC is fine and dandy, and that Boxee Box will ensure that the same experience is enjoyed by all who plant their fundament in front of your HDTV. But we all know what you're after -- lemon drops. And a mobile version of Boxee. In a post today by the company, it expressed outright joy in inking a deal with Vindicia in order to bring a payment processing solution to the platform; slated for implementation "by the end of the summer," this CashBox add-in would enable users to purchase "premium content" from Boxee's programming partners via credit card, gift card or PayPal. It's a vital step in Boxee finally finding a revenue stream (something it confessed to needing on a previous episode of The Engadget Show), and better still, "Vindicia's flexibility makes it possible for [Boxee] to enable payments on its website and across mobile platforms like the iPhone, Android and iPad." Yeah, those are the company's own words right there, and in case you still aren't believing your eyes, chew on one final quote:

"Boxee's eventual expansion to these platforms will pave the way for universally accessible content no matter where a user is (we love this idea!)."

Huzzah!

Boxee for iPhone, iPad and Android all but confirmed in Vindicia payment processing deal originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 11 May 2010 20:26:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink

20Apr/100

Review and giveaway: Lomo Diana F+ film camera with Instant Back


Short version: It’s not for everybody, but the Diana F+ with the instant back add-on is your best bet for recapturing the magic and spontaneity of the Polaroids of yore. Flimsy construction and erratic picture-taking may put off some, but unpredictability used to be in photography’s nature, and for me it was fun to return to that.

Lomo wants to give one away, too — details below.

Features:

  • Classic/cheap plastic construction
  • Compatible with a number of different film backs
  • Detachable flash included
  • Automatic and manual shutter modes, pinhole exposure mode
  • MSRP: $95 ($164 with instant back)

Pros:

  • Charmingly lo-fi operation
  • Instant film looks decent, is fun to shoot
  • Great party camera

Cons:

  • Cheap-feeling construction
  • Instax film is somewhat expensive
  • Trial and error process not for everyone

Full review:

I wrote last month that “The Polaroid saga is a long and strange one. And the last couple years have been especially strange. Bankrupt, reanimated, relaunched, sold out, bought up… I wouldn’t be surprised if Polaroid showed up on Dancing With The Stars.” All this drama is fun enough for a gadget reviewer who writes this stuff up, but what if you’re someone who legitimately just wants a fun instant camera to have at parties or out with friends? One can’t count on Polaroid any more, and although digital is great, it’s obviously not the same. I put myself in these shoes for a bit and, after noting that Lomography’s LC-A+ was getting an instant back, I contacted them about reviewing a camera somebody like you or me might want to pick up for plain instant film fun. They directed me to the Diana F+.

The Diana F+ is a remake of the classic Diana from the 60s, “updated” with rather cheap plastic construction but all in all a faithful reproduction of the famous manual camera. It should be said right away that this camera really does feel like a toy. And not a nice toy. It’s light as a feather and almost entirely plastic. It’s sturdy enough, but I wouldn’t trust it after a few drops. You just have to get past that, though — remember how rubbish film point-and-shoots used to be? This is no worse.

The point of the Diana F+, however, isn’t to be a luxury item. At $90 it’s practically an impulse buy. Its charm is in the throwback factor: it shoots to a number of films (depending on whether you accessorize with different backs) but out of the box it shoots to 120. I’m not reviewing that portion of it, however. My thoughts on the camera’s functions and such apply just as much to using it without the instant back, but of course you have to go through the whole development process and all that. So let’s move on.

The camera is fully manual, and in a way that makes you feel kind of goofy. It’s all so inexact and unpredictable that as denizens of a pixel-perfect digital age, most of our readers will find it extremely foreign if they have no experience with older film cameras. I happen to have grown up shooting black and white on a Canon SLR, but even that didn’t prepare me for the truly lo-fi process going on here.

Because it’s a rangefinder camera, focus is kind of a guessing game. There are three settings: 1-2m, 2-4m, and 4-∞m. Those of us used to imperial units may have some trouble, but after a roll or two it’ll seem second nature. The focus is pretty forgiving, and at any rate the inexact nature of shooting a camera like this makes it seem less important. Exposure is a little more important to think about, and it too has only a few settings, labeled only as suggestions: cloudy, partly cloudy, sunny, and pinhole. Again, picking the right one becomes second nature after a while, though you’ll have to be satisfied with some less-than-optimal shots before you get it right. Lastly, shutter speed is limited to two options: auto and manual. Auto is about a 60th of a second, suitable for slow-moving subjects, but it’s more just to have a known quantity to expose with. Otherwise you have to time it with your brain using the manual, or bulb, shutter mode, which simply exposes for as long as you hold down the switch. I got some great shots using this and the flash, but it’s not for everyone, and a knowledge of exposure values and such helps.

Manual advance and exposure means you can do multiple exposures on the same piece of film. My experiments in this area were largely unsuccessful, mainly because i ran out of film, but you might have better luck. As I’ve noted, experimentation and unpredictable results are what make this camera a different kind of fun than a digital.

There’s a removable flash with a great retro look for dark shots. It’s extremely bright, so you might consider putting a napkin or two in front of it, but once you get an idea of its power, you won’t overexpose too much.


The instant back is what makes this camera a worthy buy for fun-loving photogs with a little scratch to spare. It costs as much as the camera ($95) but if you buy them together you’ll save a little money. Installation is a snap — though the camera looks rather misshapen once you put it together. The back also throws off the balance, so you’ll need to consider that if you’re interested in pinhole exposures.

It shoots Fujifilm’s Instax format, which costs about $12-$14 for a pack of two cartridges, each with 10 exposures each. That works out to about 65¢ per shot. Expensive to be sure, but remember that includes processing and printing. And of course, we all know the value of the instant photographic memento. It’s the reason I’m doing this review.

Instax film is significantly smaller than Polaroids. Each shot is almost exactly the size of a credit card. Some people I talked to liked the little shots, some preferred Polaroid’s big ones. I prefer the big ones, sure, but the little guys are charming too, and Polaroid cartridges are scarce and expensive right now so the point is almost moot. There is some exposure difference between the 120 and Instax film (you have to set the camera to overexpose, essentially) but it didn’t seem to affect many of my little compositions. You can see some of them in the gallery below.

Those were with my first packet of film. I was already getting the hang of things, but framing is difficult as there are no frame guides. You get a feel for it, though.

Taking the Lomo out to a birthday party at a local bar, I found myself besieged with questions. Everybody thought the little Diana F+ was adorable, and everybody fell in love with the little instant shots. Most also expressed disapproval at the build quality, but were pleasantly surprised by the price. If you’re a social photographer, this thing comes highly recommended.

There are a number of other lenses and film backs you can apply to the Diana, but I didn’t get a chance to try any out. Just keep in mind that you’re not limited to the focal length it comes with, if you’re interested in spending a little more.

Conclusion… and Contest!

Obviously it’s a matter of taste whether or not a “novelty” camera like this is worth the $164 it will set you back. Personally, I think it’s a bargain. Instax film isn’t going anywhere, and 120 has been around for a century. It’s fun to shoot and the results are charming, though usually not what you expected. Fuji has its own Instax cameras out there, but they’re not nearly as fun and cost just as much. If photography is a hobby of yours and you miss the old days of film and instant, the Diana F+ is a great way to get back to them without much of a commitment.


Now, the contest! It’s pretty simple, really. Lomography wants to give away a Diana F+. All you have to do is send an email to crunchgear at lomography dot com saying you want it. The catch? You’re going on their mailing list for sales and new products. Of course you can opt out via the normal means later, but you will be giving them your email address. We’ll pick a winner randomly on Friday, so get in there.

Product page: Lomography Diana F+



Read more:
Review and giveaway: Lomo Diana F+ film camera with Instant Back

26Mar/100

Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case

Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case

Have mobile phones become more important than our wallets? If they haven’t, they’re certainly moving in that direction, and the Case-Mate Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case serves to remind us of that point. Why use cash when you can use a credit card, right? This case allows you to slip in two credit card sized items of your choice, so you can probably just get your ID and credit card and run away from home with your beloved Nexus One. If this is the case for you, you’ll need to shell out $29.99 to get acquainted with it.

Permalink: Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case from Ubergizmo | RSS Sponsor: Win a Fellowes Microshred Paper Shredder!

Visit link:
Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case

26Mar/100

Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case

Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case

Have mobile phones become more important than our wallets? If they haven’t, they’re certainly moving in that direction, and the Case-Mate Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case serves to remind us of that point. Why use cash when you can use a credit card, right? This case allows you to slip in two credit card sized items of your choice, so you can probably just get your ID and credit card and run away from home with your beloved Nexus One. If this is the case for you, you’ll need to shell out $29.99 to get acquainted with it.

Permalink: Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case from Ubergizmo | RSS Sponsor: Win a Fellowes Microshred Paper Shredder!

Excerpt from:
Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case

26Mar/100

Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case

Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case

Have mobile phones become more important than our wallets? If they haven’t, they’re certainly moving in that direction, and the Case-Mate Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case serves to remind us of that point. Why use cash when you can use a credit card, right? This case allows you to slip in two credit card sized items of your choice, so you can probably just get your ID and credit card and run away from home with your beloved Nexus One. If this is the case for you, you’ll need to shell out $29.99 to get acquainted with it.

Permalink: Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case from Ubergizmo | RSS Sponsor: Win a Fellowes Microshred Paper Shredder!

Read more:
Google Nexus One ID Credit Card Case